Legal Opinion
United States v. Munn
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2010No. 09-7525PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge DAVIS joined. Judge DUNCAN wrote a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KING, Circuit Judge:
Raeford Nathaniel Munn pursues this appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion for a reduced sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Munn’s motion was predicated on Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 706, which revised the Drug Quantity Table of section 2D1.1(c) by reducing the base offense level applicable to cocaine base (“crack”) offenses. The court denied the motion on the ground that, because Munn had been…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. DunphyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- United States v. Mitchell SmallsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Robert MannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. PembrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Terry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.