Legal Opinion
Vidal Sassoon, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1983No. Civ. 30689PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TROTTER, P. J.
Facts
Petitioner Vidal Sassoon, Inc. (Sassoon), defendant below, requests relief from an order compelling it to answer interrogatories and imposing sanctions.
Real party in interest Adrienne Halpem, plaintiff below, brought suit against Sassoon for injuries allegedly caused by her use of Vidal Sassoon shampoo and finishing rinse. Her counsel served interrogatories on Sassoon on January 12, 1983. Receiving no responses, counsel called Sassoon several times and was informed the interrogatories had been sent to New York on February 28 and from New York had been forwarded to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Karz v. KarlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Leach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- O'BRIEN v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sexton v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Brigante v. HuangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Morgan v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Barnett v. American-Cal Medical Services, No. 1, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Standon Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.