Legal Opinion

State v. Code

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1929No. 27,740PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Indicted for “the crime of selling unregistered interests in and under a profit sharing and participating agreement,” defendants demurred. The demurrer was overruled and the case certified on the question whether the indictment charges a public offense.

The “profit sharing and participating agreement” set out in the indictment is as follows:

“Minneapolis, Minn., Oct. 5, 1928.
“No. 875
“$225.00
“Received of George H. Taylor $225.00 as a contribution to assist me in bringing to completion a metallurgical discovery which is destined to be of incalculable benefit to mankind in obtaining a better…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. State v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. State v. OgdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  2. State v. Investors Security CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API