Legal Opinion
State v. Code
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 22, 1929No. 27,740PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Indicted for “the crime of selling unregistered interests in and under a profit sharing and participating agreement,” defendants demurred. The demurrer was overruled and the case certified on the question whether the indictment charges a public offense.
The “profit sharing and participating agreement” set out in the indictment is as follows:
“Minneapolis, Minn., Oct. 5, 1928.
“No. 875
“$225.00
“Received of George H. Taylor $225.00 as a contribution to assist me in bringing to completion a metallurgical discovery which is destined to be of incalculable benefit to mankind in obtaining a better…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. OgdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- State v. Investors Security CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932