Legal Opinion

Stern v. Prudential Financial, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 David E. Stern filed a complaint against his broker, Prudential Financial Inc., and its claimed agent, Kenneth Cohen, essentially alleging that they engaged in negligent and improper dealing in managing his account. Prudential filed preliminary objections, asserting that the complaint should be dismissed because of an arbitration provision in the parties’ “Command Client Agreement.” In response,. Stern claimed, among other things, that Prudential waived the arbitration clause.

¶ 2 The trial judge, Judge Albert W. Sheppard, Jr., based solely on affidavits, found that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Samuel J. Marranca General Contracting Co. v. Amerimar Cherry Hill Associates Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. White v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Garcia v. SavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Kwalick v. BosaccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Sew Clean Drycleaners & Launders, Inc. v. Dress for Success Cleaners, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. City of Rochester v. KottschadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Interline Brands, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Brosius, H. v. Fager, R., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API