Legal Opinion

Bumb v. Gard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1886No. 12,687PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Valentine Bumb died the owner of the real estate in controversjr, leaving surviving him his widow, Sophia Bumb, and his son, the appellant, Charles Bumb. The administrator of the estate of Valentine Bumb filed a petition asking for the sale of all the land, and to this petition the appellant, the son of the deceased, was made a party. An order was made directing the sale of all the land, and John Ruddiek, the appellees’ grantor, became the purchaser. Sophia Bumb, the widow of the intestate and mother of the appellant, died in the year 1870, and the petition to se^ll the land was filed in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Storrs v. BarkerNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  3. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Lantz v. MaffettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Avery v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Erwin v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. McBurnie v. SeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Palmerton v. HoopIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Pierce v. VansellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API