Chavez v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This is a most complicated case. It is not one in which the question is whether the claimant is entitled to compensation — that question has already been decided. Instead, the question is whether the employer, Todd Shipyards, is entitled to recompense should the worker, Prudencio Chavez, recover in tort for some of his injuries. In addition, issues have arisen, regarding whether Chavez has waived his right to workers’ compensation payments from Todd and whether the dispute regarding set-off is ripe for agency consideration, that threaten to terminate the proceeding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Socialist Labor Party v. GilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wilson v. A. H. Belo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Gemtel Corporation Gemtel Wdch Hotel Associates v. Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Palm v. Klapperman (In Re Cady)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Metropolitan Council of NAACP Branches v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- In Re Daniel Byron Cady, Debtor, Jeffrey Palm Danielle Lynn Scapparo v. Daniel Byron Cady William A. Klapperman Alfred SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.