David King v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
The defendant having been found guilty by a jury of a narcotic offense, and having admitted, orally, that this made him a second offender, the court sentenced him forthwith as such without awaiting the government’s written filing of a copy of his prior conviction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7237(c) (2). This rapidity was out of consideration for the defendant, so that he would not have to serve “bad time” before the commencement of his minimum sentence. If it was error, any prejudice has been removed by the government’s subsequent compliance with the statute.
The only question…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hoyt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Paul A. Gorin v. United States of America, Henry Grillo v. United States of America, Saul Glassman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- Katz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. ButeraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Prou v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Grigsby v. MabryDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BastaracheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.