Legal Opinion

King v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1948No. 13610PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the same question as Wright v. United States, 8 Cir., 165 F.2d 405.

Appellant, by motion to vacate judgment, sought to have his sentence and conviction set aside, on the ground that there had been an intentional and systematic exclusion of women (who are eligible for jury service in Arkansas) from the grand jury by which he was indicted and from the petit jury by which he was tried. The trial court denied the motion.

No objection had previously been made to either the grand jury or the petit jury in the trial court or on the appeal taken to this court from the conviction,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Armando A. Miranda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  2. David King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1967
  4. State v. RorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API