Legal Opinion

Margulis v. P & M CONSULTING, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2003No. ED 82679PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY K. HOFF, Judge.

P & M Consulting, Inc. (P & M) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Marilyn Margulis (Margulis) in her private right of action brought pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. Section 227(b). 1 We affirm.

I.Background Information

Margulis sued P & M alleging that P <& M violated the TCPA by placing to her residence a prerecorded telemarketing call that included the transmission of an unsolicited advertisement and was made for a commercial purpose. ' Margulis asked for damages in the amount of $4,500 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Irvine v. Akron Beacon JournalOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Harjoe v. Herz FinancialSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Whitaker v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MLC Mortgage Corp. v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys & Circuit Attorneys Retirement System v. Pemiscot CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Omerza v. Bryant, 2006-L-092 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Goat Hill Development Co. v. Lake Lotawana Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. MLC MORTGAGE CORPPORATION v. Sun America Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API