Legal Opinion

Veness v. Midland Risk Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 2000No. 71A04-9907-CV-313PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Michelle Veness brought this action against Midland Risk Insurance Company (“Midland”) seeking to recover damages under the underinsured motorist coverage provision of her policy with Midland for bodily injuries she suffered during an accident. She now appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Midland.

We reverse and remand.

ISSUE

Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Midland.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The following facts are undisputed. On May 27, 1997, Veness was a passenger on a motorcycle being…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Eurick v. Pemco Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Continental Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Miller v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Harden v. Monroe Guaranty InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Balagtas v. BishopIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GarrettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Beam v. Wausau Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Progressive Paloverde Insurance v. Jacob P. ArnoldIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API