Legal Opinion
Harden v. Monroe Guaranty Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1993No. 41A01-9207-CV-210PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Lisa and Ancel Harden (“Hardens”) appeal from a declaratory judgment for Monroe Guaranty Insurance Company (“Monroe Guaranty”) denying Lisa coverage for injuries from an automobile accident which occurred while Lisa was a customer of Independent Auto Brokers (“IAB”). Monroe Guaranty insured IAB under a garage dealers policy. The trial court held that Lisa was neither an insured nor an underinsured motorist under the policy.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The Hardens purport to raise eighteen issues on appeal. 1 We consolidate and restate the issues as follows:
1. Whether the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Indiana Industries, Inc. v. Wedge Products, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance v. Statesman InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Aubrey v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Stevenson v. Hamilton Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Smith v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jackson v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.