Legal Opinion

Progressive Paloverde Insurance v. Jacob P. Arnold

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2014No. 49A02-1402-CT-62PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

This appeal - involves a claim for uninsured motorist proceeds by Jacob Arnold against his auto insurer, Progressive Palo-verde Insurance (“Progressive”). Progressive brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s order denying Progressive’s motion for partial summary judgment. Progressive raises one issue for review: whether the trial court’s denial of partial summary judgment was erroneous. Concluding there is no genuine issue of material fact and Progressive is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we reverse.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mary Alice Manley, and Gary Manley v. Ryan J. Sherer, M.D., and Sherer Family Medicine, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Meredith v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Amaya v. BraterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Jackson v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Veness v. Midland Risk Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bremni Onelio Villatoro v. AmGuard Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Michael Hesser v. John AbneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company v. Robert ChastainIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API