Legal Opinion
Pacific Alaska Contractors, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 22, 1971No. 294-67PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM: *
In accordance with the standards for judicial review prescribed by the Wun-derlich Act, plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment present issues concerning the finality of a decision of the Department of Commerce Appeals Board, DCAB No. PR-46, 66-1 BCA j[ 5532, as modified on motion for clarification and reconsideration, 66-2 BCA fl 6043.
I
On October 6, 1959, plaintiff and defendant (by its Bureau of Public Roads, Department of Commerce) entered into contract No. CPR 10-300, by which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Laburnum Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Lathan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Hardeman-Monier-Hutcherson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Spirit Leveling Contractors v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.