Honn v. National Computer Systems, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
This appeal arises out of an action brought by respondent Laron E. Honn against appellants Melvin C. Gittleman, Rochelle Gittleman and The Melco Investment Company, alleging failure to pay the interest and principal on a promissory note, as modified by a settlement and later agreement. The district court rejected the statute of limitations defense raised by appellants and ordered judgment in favor of respondent. Because we disagree with the district court’s handling of the statute of limitations defense, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Respondent originally…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dent Ex Rel. Dent v. CasagaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Toomey v. CammackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Township of Normania v. County of Yellow MedicineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Chase Nat. Bank v. BurgDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
- Frenzel v. FrenzelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Thread & Gage Co., Inc. v. KucinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- AMERICAN STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF WILLISTON v. SorensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Application of ChurchColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re William A. Westerhoff and Barbara A. Westerhoff, Debtors. William A. Westerhoff and Barbara A. Westerhoff v. Richard L. Slind and Mary M. SlindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.