Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Helm

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1959No. 6692Published

1DissentJohnson, Justice

I regret that I cannot concur in the disposition of this case by the majority of the Court. The sole issue presented to this ■Court by the application to abandon the proceedings with respect to appellee-lessees, is whether, when the condemning authority •acquires a title in fee simple to property by Tight of eminent domain, lesser interests in the property, such as a leasehold, are -thereby included in the taking. If the answer lies in the affirmative, the decision in this case must be regarded as wholly erroneous.

A lessee of property is an “owner” in the constitutional sense for the taking…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. People v. . Adirondack Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API