State v. Helm
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentJohnson, Justice
I regret that I cannot concur in the disposition of this case by the majority of the Court. The sole issue presented to this ■Court by the application to abandon the proceedings with respect to appellee-lessees, is whether, when the condemning authority •acquires a title in fee simple to property by Tight of eminent domain, lesser interests in the property, such as a leasehold, are -thereby included in the taking. If the answer lies in the affirmative, the decision in this case must be regarded as wholly erroneous.
A lessee of property is an “owner” in the constitutional sense for the taking…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People v. . Adirondack Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.