Legal Opinion
Marcus v. Textile Banking Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 26, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant Cohn moves herein to dismiss the instant action pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground, inter alia, of lack of jurisdiction over his person. Since it is clear that his position is well taken, the Court need not discuss the other proffered grounds. However, mention will be made of the apparent violation by plaintiffs of the order of the Honorable Judge Blumenfeld of the District Court of Connecticut in the institution of the within action.
On March 3, 1965, defendant made a similar motion returnable before Judge Cannella.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Greenberg v. GIANNINICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Miriam J. Wolf v. Curtis BarkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Spearman v. Sterling Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- Emerson v. National Cylinder Gas CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,592 Paulette Papilsky v. Alvin H. Berndt, and Carl W. KnoblochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Milstein v. WernerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Zucker v. KatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- In Re Penn Central Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.