State v. Flores
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 This case requires us to decide under what circumstances officers making a lawful arrest may seize a companion of the arrestee in the absence of reasonable suspicion to independently justify a Terry1 stop of the companion. We hold that where officers have an objective rationale predicated on safety concerns to seize a companion to secure the scene of the arrest, article I, section 7 of the Washington State Constitution allows for the seizure, so long as it remains reasonable in scope and duration. Based on this holding, we reverse the Court of Appeals and hold that evidence of the gun…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Of Washington v. Kenneth Lee ButlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Commonwealth v. RamirezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Carmen Rose LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In re T.B.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Potter v. City of LaceyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.