Legal Opinion

Giles v. Herzstein

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1939No. 4493PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINN, Justice.

Plaintiff (appellee here), filed his complaint praying for judgment against defendant (appellant here) in the sum of $1,950. He alleged that pursuant to an oral agreement, plaintiff and defendant agreed to enter into the cattle buying business and divide the profits but not the losses. That they bought about 200 head of cattle which the defendant later sold at a profit of $3,900, and refused to pay the plaintiff his half of the profits.

The defendant answered, admitting the venture, alleging that it was a partnership arrangement, however, conditioned upon sharing losses as well…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kakos v. ByramMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Portland v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Kredo v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Ford v. SchallOregon Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Landers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  2. McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Crenshaw v. CrenshawMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. London v. BruskasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Giles v. HerzsteinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API