Legal Opinion

Kredo v. Phelps

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1904No. S.F. No. 2899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff. Appellants contend that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the findings are outside of the issues stated in the pleadings. Both contentions will have to be sustained.

The substance of the complaint is; That at all times therein named the plaintiff “was in the quiet and peaceable enjoyment of a certain two rooms in a certain house known and designated as No." 937 Post Street in the city and county of San Francisco. . . . That while plaintiff was in the possession of said rooms, the said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schirmer v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. McCord v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Morrow v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Peek v. SteinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Howard v. SchanielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API