Lawson v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
The issue presented is whether William F. Lawson (Petitioner) was denied due process because he did not receive a de novo hearing on his appeal from a decision by Homemaker Services of the Metropolitan Area, Inc. (Homemaker) to terminate his attendant care services. We hold that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Bureau of Hearings and Appeals (Bureau) applied the wrong standard of review and did not conduct a de novo hearing on Petitioner’s appeal and thus denied Petitioner due process. Therefore, we reverse the order of the Bureau and remand…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lyness v. Com., State Bd. of MedicineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Soja v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Manor v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Snyder v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor VehiclesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Chiro-Med Review Co. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Snyder v. COM, DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Bouman v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.