Legal Opinion
Matter of Applications for Authority
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 13, 1992No. C8-92-785Published
1Opinion of the Court
490 N.W.2d 920 (1992)
In the Matter of the APPLICATIONS FOR AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE OPERATOR SERVICES IN MINNESOTA.
No. C8-92-785.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
October 13, 1992.
Review Denied December 15, 1992.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Julia E. Anderson, Gary R. Cunningham, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., St. Paul, for relator Attorney General.
Amy V. Kvalseth, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for relator Dept. of Public Service.
Rosellen M. Condon, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent Minnesota Public Utilities Com'n.
David G. Seykora, William M. Ojile, Jr., Minneapolis, for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Beaty v. Minnesota Board of TeachingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Morey v. School Board of Independent School District No. 492Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.