Legal Opinion
Transdermal Products, Inc. v. Performance Contract Packaging, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 1996No. Civil Action 96-3504PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
This action involves alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., and the Pennsylvania Trademark Act, 54 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 1101 et seq. The plaintiff, Transdermal Products, Inc. (“Trans-dermal”), also claims tortious interference with contracts. Defendants, Performance Contract Packaging, Inc. (“PCP”), and two of PCP’s employees, Edward Parker and Kevin Parker, presently seek leave from this court to join Laboratorio Maver, S.A. (“Maver”) as a third-party defendant under Rule 14 of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Svetz for Svetz v. Land Tool Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bauer Lamp Co., Inc. v. Martin Shaffer, Howard Levi, Shaffer & Levi, Inc., a Florida Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Landrau v. Solis BetancourtDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Basketball Marketing Co. v. FX Digital Media, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- LANDRAU v. BetancourtDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- PERIPHAGEN, INC. v. KRYSTAL BIOTECH, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020