Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1996Published
1Opinion of the Court
933 S.W.2d 450 (1996)
STATE of Tennessee, Appellee,
v.
Nathan SMITH, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.
November 12, 1996.
Charles W.B. Fels, Kenneth F. Irvine, Jr., Knoxville, on appeal, Edward L. Hiland, Nashville, Charles I. Poole, Sevierville, at trial, for Appellant.
Charles W. Burson, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael Moore, Solicitor General, Michael W. Catalano, Associate Solicitor General, Victor S. Johnson, III, District Attorney General, Renee Erb, Asst. District Attorney General, Nashville, for Appellee.
OPINION
BIRCH, Chief Justice.
Nathan Smith, the defendant,…
Also in this document: Dissent · Reid; Dissent · White.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.