Legal Opinion

Sarchet v. Bunn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1957No. 583Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

The appeal is from an order of the trial court overruling defendants motion to reconsider its decision overruling defendants motion to vacate a judgment taken against them on a cognovit note.

At the outset, we are met with a motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution because the notice of appeal is not directed to a final order.

The claim of appellee is that the motion to reconsider the refusal to vacate the cognovit judgment is not a motion for a new trial for the reason that it required no determination of an issue of fact.

Appellee cites State, ex…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. McGillOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Morrison v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Rismiller v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API