Legal Opinion

Coronavirus Reporter Corporation v. Apple Inc

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 25, 2025No. 3:24-cv-08660Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CORONAVIRUS REPORTER Case No. 24-cv-08660-EMC CORPORATION, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 9 MOTION TO DISMISS v. 10 APPLE INC, Docket No. 62 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiffs challenge Defendant Apple Inc.’s alleged monopolization of the app distribution 16 market for its devices. Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First 17 Amended Complaint (“FAC 2”). Dkt. 62. Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by res judicata. See 18 Coronavirus Reporter v. Apple Inc.,

2021 WL…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Headwaters Inc., an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation Forest Conservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Kolela Mpoyo v. Litton Electro-Optical SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API