Legal Opinion

People v. Valentine

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 2006No. B182712PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J.

Appellant Vincent Valentine, Jr., is charged with the crime of robbery. He contends that the evidence shows that he committed the crime of receiving stolen property and asks the trial court to instruct the jury on the elements of that uncharged offense. He hopes to convince the jury that he committed the uncharged offense and that he be acquitted of the charged offense. He is not entitled to such an instruction.

Valentine is convicted of second degree robbery. (Pen. Code, § 211.) He admits a prior strike for residential burglary (§§ 667, subds. (c)(1), (e)(1), 1170.12, subds.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. SamayoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. State v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. People v. Cortez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. LAMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API