Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 9, 1985No. 1 CA-IC 3059PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge.

The facts in this review of an Industrial Commission award are as follows. On April 9, 1981, the alleged employee, Bill E. French, (claimant) suffered an injury to his eye. The claimant maintained he was working for James Frazier, the alleged employer (petitioner) constructing a wall when a line snapped and struck the claimant in the eye. The petitioner maintained the claimant was not working for him but rather, he was “just hanging around”. The petitioner did not have Worker’s Compensation insurance.

The claimant filed a claim for benefits in January, 1982 which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Parsons v. Bekins FreightArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Magma Copper Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. McKaskle v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Toto v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lewis v. TrimbleOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Marriott Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Santiago v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Naglieri v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API