Legal Opinion

McKaskle v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 30, 1982No. 1 CA-IC 2590PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

At issue in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award is whether the administrative law judge abused his discretion in dismissing petitioner’s claim as being untimely filed without a meritorious excuse. We conclude that this was not the proper test to be employed in this case. We further conclude that respondents would be estopped to assert the statute of limitations if it is determined that the petitioner exercised due diligence in filing his claim within a reasonable period of time after the circumstances giving rise to estoppel ceased to be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Pino v. Maplewood Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  3. Levo v. General-Shea-MorrisonMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. McMeekin v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Duncan v. Gaffney Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bauer v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wassberg v. Anaconda Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Snow v. AlcoaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Wausau Insurance Companies v. Van BieneAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Holler v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API