Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Trimble

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1997No. 1995-2427PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 231.] LEWIS, APPELLANT, v. TRIMBLE, ADMR., BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Lewis v. Trimble,

1997-Ohio-393.] Workers’ compensation—Application and requirements of R.C. 4123.84 with regard to “flow-through” or residual medical conditions—Self-insured employer makes a conclusive determination to allow a claim for a residual or “flow-through” condition, when. 1. R.C. 4123.84 requires that written notice of the specific part or parts of the body claimed to have been injured must be given within…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lane v. Bur. of Workers' CompOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API