Lewis v. Trimble
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 231.] LEWIS, APPELLANT, v. TRIMBLE, ADMR., BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Lewis v. Trimble,
1997-Ohio-393.] Workers’ compensation—Application and requirements of R.C. 4123.84 with regard to “flow-through” or residual medical conditions—Self-insured employer makes a conclusive determination to allow a claim for a residual or “flow-through” condition, when. 1. R.C. 4123.84 requires that written notice of the specific part or parts of the body claimed to have been injured must be given within…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mauzy v. Kelly Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Gregory v. FlowersOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lane v. Bur. of Workers' CompOhio Court of Appeals · 2012