Legal Opinion
Gottlieb v. Peck & Mack Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 31, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District. Action by Oscar Gottlieb against the Peck & Mack Company. From .a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed on reargument, •after affirmance without opinion.
1Per curiam
At the October, 1909, term of this court, the appeal of the plaintiff herein from a judgment dismissing his complaint *830was heard, the judgment reversed, and this court in its opinion then-said, inter alia:
“It seems to us that the complaint states a good .cause of action. The proof of the plaintiff’s case depends upon the question whether the record of tlieearlier trial will show that the jury made an allowance of $217 upon the offer of the defendant to return goods of that value.” 119 N. Y. Supp. 610.
The plaintiff suedl for conversion, and recovered a judgment upon-the second trial, which was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Witherbee v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Bunke v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Reese v. BaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Bunke v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
- Milella v. SimpsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brook Iron Works, Inc. v. CohenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930