Legal Opinion

Stinchcomb v. Hoard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 31, 1965No. 22946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

A petition is subject to general demurrer in two instances: (1) where it is inherently insufficient to set forth the plaintiff’s right to the recovery sought or the relief prayed; (2) when it reveals that there is a valid defense that may, at the defendant’s election, be interposed to the cause plead, such as the statute of limitation, the bar of laches, or the statute of frauds. In the first of these instances a general demurrer may attack the petition upon the broad ground that it sets forth no cause of action. In the latter instance the demurrer must specifically point…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pittman v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Smith v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Kilgore v. PaschallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Lee v. HolmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Kinney v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. Goldome Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Columbus Bank & Trust Co. v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API