Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Cannonsburg Skiing Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1988No. Docket 98585PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.

Plaintiff’s decedent died as the resuit of injuries incurred when he struck, while downhill skiing, the lone tree growing on a ski slope operated by defendant. Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8). The trial court ruled that plaintiff’s claims of negligence and intentional nuisance were barred by the Ski Area Safety Act, MCL 408.321 et seq.; MSA 18.483(1) et seq. We agree and affirm.

Section 22(2) of the Ski Area Safety Act, MCL 408.342(2); MSA 18.483(22)(2), provides:

Each person who participates in the sport…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Grieb v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Canaan Valley Resorts, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Brett v. Great American Recreation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Randi Beth Berniger v. Meadow Green-Wildcat Corp., D/B/A Wildcat MountainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Halpern v. WheeldonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API