State v. Walter
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] David A. Walter appeals from a final judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance (methamphet-' amine). Walter asserts the circuit court erred in denying his motion to suppress drug evidence obtained during a “stop and frisk” initiated by a Rapid City police officer. According to Walter, the officer lacked a reasonable basis to conclude Walter had committed a crime. We reverse.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] The parties stipulated the relevant facts of this appeal. On October 1, 2013, at approximately 6:15 p.m., Rapid City Police Officer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MedicineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. StanageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Hi Ta LarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Short BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.