Legal Opinion

Johnson v. County of Steele

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1953No. 35,944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an action in nuisance and trespass brought by a landowner for alleged invasions and appropriations of his property during certain ditch construction work. Plaintiff appeals from the orders sustaining the separate demurrers of the two defendants.

The complaint alleges that the county board of defendant county, pursuant to a petition asking for a “repair” of a certain ditch running through plaintiff’s land, appointed defendant P. C. Hosfield to prepare the necessary plans and specifications to make this ditch “function efficiently.” The county accepted the plans and specifications…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Lane v. Minnesota State Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. McClure v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Keever v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API