Legal Opinion
United States v. Krupa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2011No. 09-10396PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge BERZON.
ORDER
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
The petition for rehearing is granted, the opinion and dissent filed on February 7, 2011 are withdrawn, and a new opinion and -dissent are filed concurrent with this order.
The grant of the petition for rehearing and the filing of a new opinion and dissent moots the petition for rehearing en banc. The parties may file new petitions for rehearing from the new opinion and dissent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40.
*1176OPINION
Peter Krupa appeals from his conditional guilty plea to receiving material…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Micah J. GourdeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Justin Barrett HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Chad CamouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. John UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. JobCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. James Grant, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Nahach GarayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.