Legal Opinion

In re Return of Weapons to J.W.D.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 6, 1997PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

The dispositive legal issue is whether a defendant in an action under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, N.J.S.A 2C:25-17 to -33 (“Domestic Violence Act” or the “Act”), is entitled to the return of firearms if the trial court, after dismissing the domestic violence complaint, concludes that the defendant poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. The Chancery Division, Family Part, held that defendant posed such a threat, notwithstanding its prior dismissal of the domestic violence complaint. Consequently, the court ordered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. NJ Builders, Owners and Managers Association v. BlairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. Cesare v. CesareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Marino v. MarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  3. State v. RussoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. In Re the State for the Forfeiture of Personal Weapons & Firearms Identification Card Belonging to F.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API