Legal Opinion
ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1983No. Civ. A. 80-1341PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Three divergent legal theories, each of which has been accepted by a different Circuit Court, are at bar for consideration. In chronological order, the Sixth Circuit has held that the obligations imposed upon insurance companies by the standard comprehensive general liability policy issued to asbestos manufacturers and installers is triggered by a claim that an asbestos victim was exposed to the insured’s asbestos-containing products during the policy period. Insurance Company of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 633 F.2d 1212, 1225…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- C. A. Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- 18 Collier bankr.cas.2d 34, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,032, 5 Ucc rep.serv.2d 354 in Re Meyertech Corp., Debtor. Southeastern Sprinkler Company, Inc. v. Meyertech CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.