Legal Opinion

Silgaro v. Port Compress Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided April 16, 1942No. Civ. A. No. 117Published

1Opinion of the Court

KENNERLY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a former employee of defendant, in his complaint filed February 5, 1941, sues defendant under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 to 219, for overtime between July 1, 1939, and September 6, 1940, and damages and attorney’s fees, as provided in such Act. Defendant, owner and operator of a compress for the compressing of cotton for others for hire, in its amended answer, filed January 26, 1942, denies that either it or plaintiff, its employee, were, during such period, engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Gordon v. Paducah Ice Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API