Legal Opinion
Sampson v. McAdoo
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 5, 1981No. 600, September Term, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The defaulting executory vendees of improved residential property located in the District of Columbia brought suit against the vendors for the recovery of a $5,000 deposit. The court (Mitchell, J.) granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, finding that the vendors had failed to forfeit the deposit under an option contained in the contract of sale. For the reasons stated, we reverse.
I
The contract between the parties was entered into on May 19,1978, and provided for the purchase and sale of premises known as 1417 Longfellow St., N.W., Washington, D.C. for the sum of $124,000. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barnette v. SayersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Sheffield v. Paul T. Stone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Asher v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Chasanow v. WillcoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Casey v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonsalves v. BingelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Ravenstar, LLC v. One Ski Hill Place, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Ecology Services, Inc. v. Granturk Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Wetmore v. Mose-Ark Enterprises, Inc. (In re Klemen)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982