Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Bi-State Dev. Agency
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 21, 2018No. ED 106158PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Presiding Judge
Introduction
Natasha Jordan ("Appellant") appeals the judgment of the circuit court of St. Louis County dismissing her claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act ("MHRA") for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Appellant alleged nine counts against Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District ("Bi-State") and Lawrence Brew ("Brew") (collectively "Respondents") relating to discrimination on the bases of sex, disability, race, and retaliation.
Respondents moved to dismiss for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wierman v. Casey's General StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Zaderaka v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Daugherty v. City of Maryland HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Midstate Oil Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bram v. AT&T Mobility Servs., LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Scott Gustafson v. Bi-State Development AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Gustafson v. Bi-State Development AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
- Beverly Brennan, Respondent, vs. Harris-Stowe State University, Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- Edgar Alfonzo Banks v. Kansas City Area Transportation AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.