Legal Opinion
Nitich v. Fernandez
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1961No. Civ. 25137PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal from an order granting motions of defendants Felipe Fernandez and City of Los Angeles for a new trial.
The question is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain and determine the motions.
Chronology:
March 25, 1960—jury returned verdict for plaintiff against Fernandez and City of Los Angeles. Defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for new trial. Hearing of the motions continued to April 5, 1960. Entry of judgment stayed.
March 31,1960—City of Los Angeles served and filed notice of intention to move for new trial on various…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Power & Bro., Ltd. v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- Tabor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Fong Chuck v. Chin Po FoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Peters v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- The Yamato v. Bank of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966