Legal Opinion

The Yamato v. Bank of Southern California

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1915No. L.A. No. 3464PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover possession of fifty shares of its capital stock, alleged to be wrongfully in the possession of the defendant. The right of plaintiff’s possession, as pleaded, rested in a pledge of the stock by one Inui as security for the payment of his promissory note to the plaintiff in the sum of four thousand one hundred and seventy-five dollars. Inui at that time and thereafter was the secretary of the plaintiff. The defendant asserted the right to possession of the stock as collateral security for a promissory note which Inui made to it some six months after the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Power & Bro., Ltd. v. TurnerMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McIntyre v. MacGinnissMontana Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. United States Cold Storage Co. v. Central Manufacturing District BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Tabor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Camerer v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API