Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1916No. Civ. No. 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In this case the defendants executed an undertaking in the sum of $460 for the release of an attachment which had been levied on the property of the C. L. Decker Company in an action in which that company was defendant and the plaintiff’s assignor, Samuel Meyer, was plaintiff, and in which judgment went in favor of plaintiff. In the trial of that action it was stipulated by the parties thereto in open court that the judgment to be rendered therein should be final. Judgment was duly rendered, and no motion for a new trial was made nor any appeal taken, and at the time of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heisen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. King v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Schlieman v. BowlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Ullmann v. KlineIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Preston v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. García v. Commonwealth Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  2. Cope v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Nelson v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Heyer v. KaufenbergWyoming Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API