Legal Opinion

Heyer v. Kaufenberg

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1929No. 1544PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kiner, Justice.

This is a proceeding by direct appeal to review a judgment of the District Court of Fremont County in favor of A. 0. Heyer, respondent here and plaintiff below. The appellant Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, hereinafter, for convenience, mentioned as the “Bonding Company,” was the only defendant served with process in the District Court and the only party making a defense to the action.

The facts upon which the sole question presented by the briefs of the parties arises, appear to be these: On the 16th and 17th of February, 1927, the respondent Heyer obtained two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bolen v. . CrosbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Schlieman v. BowlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Redmond v. . StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Citizens' National Bank v. LoomisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Commonwealth v. WamplerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A.J. Properties, LLC v. Stanley Black and Decker, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API