Cherry v. Berg
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice,
This is a usury case. Plaintiffs Hatto M. Berg and Atley M. Berg brought suit to declare that a certain promissory note was usurious. They sought in their suit to have all of the interest payments made by them applied to the principal debt; cancellation of the indebtedness; return of the moneys paid into the registry of the court representing the balance of the note and interest pending a final determination of their cause; release and cancellation of the lien securing the note; and judgment for penalty, interest and attorney fees. The case was tried before a jury,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Jennings v. Texas Farm Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Commerce Trust Co. v. BestTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Temple Trust Co. v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Irving Bank & Trust Co. v. Second Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Realtex Corp. v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Liberty Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Jack WaggonerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Ferguson v. Tanner Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- F.D.I.C. v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993