Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Berg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1974No. 799PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice,

This is a usury case. Plaintiffs Hatto M. Berg and Atley M. Berg brought suit to declare that a certain promissory note was usurious. They sought in their suit to have all of the interest payments made by them applied to the principal debt; cancellation of the indebtedness; return of the moneys paid into the registry of the court representing the balance of the note and interest pending a final determination of their cause; release and cancellation of the lien securing the note; and judgment for penalty, interest and attorney fees. The case was tried before a jury,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Jennings v. Texas Farm Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Commerce Trust Co. v. BestTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Temple Trust Co. v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Irving Bank & Trust Co. v. Second Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Realtex Corp. v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Liberty Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Jack WaggonerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Ferguson v. Tanner Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. F.D.I.C. v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API