Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Tanner Development Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 19, 1976No. 16729PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is a suit seeking to recover the statutory penalties for usury. The plaintiffs allege that a note secured by a vendor’s lien on certain real estate required the payment of interest at a rate in excess of the statutory limit. They sought recovery of a penalty in amount of twice the interest charged and a permanent injunction against the foreclosure of the vendor’s lien. After a trial to the court without a jury a judgment was entered denying the relief sought by plaintiffs and ordering foreclosure by judicial sale. The judgment will be reversed and rendered.

In…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Walker v. Temple Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Conte v. Greater Houston BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. West, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  5. Realtex Corp. v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API