Legal Opinion
Dibiase v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-3171PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PADOVA, District Judge.
This case involves allegations of age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C.A. § 621-634 (West 1985 & Supp. 1993). Plaintiffs amended complaint asserts two claims: Count I avers that defendant, SmithKline Beecham Corporation (“Smith-Kline”), discriminated based on age when it terminated Plaintiffs employment; Count II asserts that a waiver provision in Smith-Kline’s separation benefit package violates ADEA. SmithKline filed this motion for summary judgment on both Counts of Plaintiffs amended complaint. 1 For…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John Dibiase v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Griffin v. Kraft General Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Waldron v. SL Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Bader v. Berenfield Containers, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.