Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 24, 1995No. 93 C 7132PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODIFIED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
This matter arises from allegations that Sears Roebuck and Company’s (“Sears”) “Big Ticket Severance Allowance Plan” (“the Plan”) offered to certain sales employees violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) brought this action against Sears asserting that the Plan violated section 4(a) of the ADEA, 29 U.S.C. § 621. Sears now seeks dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 For the reasons…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Robert R. Henn v. National Geographic SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Paul H. KRALMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS’ AFFAIRS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- John Dibiase v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whitehead v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Tom Cooney, Jr. v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Massachusetts v. Bull HN Information Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sara Lee Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
- Bridget Jones v. Reliant Energy-ArklaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.