Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stumpf v. Houk

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2011No. 01-3613Published

1DissentBoggs, Circuit Judge

The majority has resurrected a new substantive right of their own invention, which made its first appearance in Stumpf v. Mitchell, 367 F.3d 594 (6th Cir.2004), vacated by Bradshaw v. Stumpf, 545 U.S. 175, 125 S.Ct. 2398, 162 L.Ed.2d 143 (2005), and apparently had all along been lurking somewhere within the Fourteenth Amendment. In its current iteration, the new right protects a convicted murderer from being sentenced to death where mitigating evidence (i.e., evidence that does not undermine the murder conviction itself but that might have counseled towards a more lenient sentence) discovered…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API