Legal Opinion
Lancaster County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge McCULLOUGH.
Lancaster County (County) petitions for review of the May 15, 2012 final order of *1102the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB) that dismissed the County’s exceptions to the hearing examiner’s decision and order, concluding that the County violated sections 1201(a)(1) and (3) of the Public Employe Relations Act (PERA)1 in terminating the employment of Tommy Epps and Adam Medina in retaliation for their union activities. Among other things, the County contends on appeal that the evidence was legally insufficient to support a finding that it had knowledge of Epps’ and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. O. A. Fuller Super Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Gallo v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Se-Ling Hosiery, Inc. v. MarguliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Goldtex, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Goldtex, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lancaster County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Exec. Transp. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Executive Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Capital City Cab Serv. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Lancaster County v. PLRBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016